Texas infrastructure
Texas toll-road ownership: map, tables and source data
TxDOT runs SH 130’s first four segments, and a private concession runs the last two. Search a Texas toll road for its operator, its billing, and, where sourced, its owner.
SH 130 changes financing models after Segment 4: Segments 1–4 belong to TxDOT’s public system, while Segments 5–6 operate under a state concession. Search a named road to see who runs it, who bills you, and, where a source names it, the public owner. Each segment links its sources. The map points mark regions, so use a navigation app for directions.
SH 288 has another split: TxDOT’s Harris County lanes returned to public control in 2024, while Brazoria County administers its own section. The TxDOT operator list, SH 130 agreement, and Brazoria history supply the records.
Method & limits
An October 26, 2026 research edition of selected named facilities from TxDOT’s operator list, with sourced concession details. The map uses approximate regional locators, not road alignments or property boundaries. Missing title and investor percentages remain missing.
The lookup filters the same facility records
Search by the road name, route abbreviation, public authority or operator. Region and control filters combine with the search. Selecting a map region filters the same records; selecting a result opens its authority, billing, concession, and source fields. Clear the filters to restore the full edition.
A public authority’s name identifies the responsible body in the official list. The public-title field is populated only where this edition has an explicit source for roadway title; a blank does not imply private land. The original ownership investigation explains the legal and financial layers in greater detail.
October 26, 2026 · 44 named facility records
The name on the bill is only one layer
Select a region or search a road. Public authority, operating company and billing service stay in separate fields.
44 of 44 records
Public operation
Dallas North Tollway (DNT)
NTTA facility
- Public authority
- North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA)
- Operator
- North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA)
- Billing service
- North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA)
- Toll-revenue claim
- North Texas Tollway System, subject to its financing pledges
- Roadway / System title
- NTTA / public System assets
Public NTTA System. Do not confuse NTTA with North Tarrant Express (NTE).
Checked 2026-10-26 · Record ntta-dnt
Missing title and investor fields are retained as missing. Records in one authority can share the same financing pledge. Download CSV, JSON or GeoJSON with the field dictionary and primary sources.
Ownership map
| Facility or system | Region | Physical owner | Toll-revenue owner | Concessionaire | Current direct equity owners | Ownership percentages | Ultimate owners | Concession expiration | Current status | Evidence date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Texas Tollway System (NTTA) | DFW | NTTA; Sam Rayburn Tollway is a right-to-use state asset | NTTA system | None | Not applicable | Public authority | No shareholders | None; SRT use right ends 2058 | Operating public, system-pledged network | FY ended Dec. 31, 2025; board data 2026 |
| Harris County Toll Road Authority | Houston | Harris County | HCTRA enterprise fund | None | Not applicable | County enterprise | Harris County | None | Operating public system | FY ended Sept. 30, 2025 |
| Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority system | Austin | CTRMA / applicable public right-of-way owners | CTRMA system; MoPac Express is non-system | None | Not applicable | Independent public authority | No shareholders | None | Operating; system and non-system pledges reported apart | FY ended June 30, 2025 |
| Central Texas Turnpike System | Austin | State of Texas / TxDOT | CTTS | None | Not applicable | State system | State of Texas | None; final debt maturity 2042 | Operating public system | FY ended Aug. 31, 2025 |
| Grand Parkway System / GPTC | Houston region | State of Texas / TxDOT | Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation system | None | Not applicable | TxDOT component corporation | State public structure | None; final debt maturity 2053 | Operating public, system-pledged network | FY ended Aug. 31, 2025 |
| TxDOT I-35E managed lanes | DFW | State of Texas / TxDOT | TxDOT project | None | Not applicable | State project | State of Texas | None; final debt maturity 2052 | Operating publicly | FY ended Aug. 31, 2025 |
| TxDOT SH 249 System | Houston / Montgomery–Grimes | State of Texas / TxDOT | TxDOT system | None | Not applicable | State system | State of Texas | None; final debt maturity 2057 | Operating publicly | FY ended Aug. 31, 2025 |
| Fort Bend County Toll Road Authority | Fort Bend County | Fort Bend County public structure | FBCTRA | None | Not applicable | County component unit | Fort Bend County | None | Operating public system | FY ended Sept. 30, 2025 |
| Fort Bend Grand Parkway Toll Road Authority, Segment D | Fort Bend County | State/TxDOT right-of-way; authority right of use | FBGPTRA | None | Not applicable | County component unit | Fort Bend County | No private concession | Operating public facility | FY ended Sept. 30, 2025 |
| North Tarrant Express | DFW | State of Texas / TxDOT | NTE Mobility Partners, LLC, subject to sharing and debt | NTE Mobility Partners, LLC | Ferrovial/Cintra affiliate; Meridiam affiliate | 62.97%; 37.03% | Ferrovial N.V.; Meridiam-managed funds | 2061 | Operating private concession on public road | May 2026 — confirmed percentages |
| LBJ Express | DFW | State of Texas / TxDOT | LBJ Infrastructure Group, LLC, subject to sharing and debt | LBJ Infrastructure Group, LLC | Ferrovial/Cintra affiliate; APG affiliate; Meridiam affiliate | 54.60%; 28.33%; 17.07% | Ferrovial N.V.; APG-managed pension capital; Meridiam-managed funds | 2061 | Operating private concession on public road | May 2026 — confirmed percentages |
| NTE 35W | DFW | State of Texas / TxDOT | NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3, LLC, subject to sharing and debt | NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3, LLC | Ferrovial/Cintra affiliate; APG affiliate; Meridiam affiliate | 53.67%; 28.84%; 17.49% | Ferrovial N.V.; APG-managed pension capital; Meridiam-managed funds | 2061 | Operating private concession on public road | May 2026 — confirmed percentages |
| SH 130 Segments 5–6 | Austin–San Antonio corridor | State of Texas / TxDOT | SH 130 Concession Company, after sharing and debt | SH 130 Concession Company, LLC | SVP-controlled vehicle; U.S. DOT / Build America interest | Approx. 65% SVP; 32% U.S. DOT; 4% other (2Q 2024; rounded) | Strategic Value Partners funds and investors; U.S. federal government | 2062 | Operating post-bankruptcy concession | Exact percentages 2Q 2024; majority/minority structure reconfirmed July 2026 |
| Former SH 288 managed-lane concession | Houston | State of Texas / TxDOT | Texas Transportation Finance Corporation / public structure | None since Oct. 8, 2024 | None | Public | State of Texas structure | Private term ended; original expiry March 2068 | Publicly controlled after termination; HCTRA supports billing | July 2026; FY2025 financial reporting |
Ownership labels refer to the economic and legal layer stated in each column. They do not convert a project-company percentage into ownership of state land. Sources: S1, S6, S10–S22. Ferrovial’s April 30, 2026 announcement records its conversion from SE to N.V. with the same legal personality and rights.
Private concession comparison
| Project | Original project cost | Opening date | Concession length / remaining term | Toll structure | Major debt sources | Current ownership | Financial turning point | Current investment relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SH 130 Segments 5–6 | $1.328bn | Oct./Nov. 2012 | 50 years to 2062; about 36 years remain | Scheduled tolls; annual escalation linked to nominal Texas GSP per capita; vehicle classes | Originally $685.8m senior banks and $430m TIFIA; $260m new financing disclosed at emergence; current debt unavailable | SVP-controlled majority; U.S. DOT minority; dated estimate 65% / 32% / 4% other (2Q 2024; rounded) | 2016 Chapter 11; 2017 debt-to-equity restructuring | Possible concession-company secondary, continuation vehicle, or refinancing; federal stake and limited disclosure complicate access |
| North Tarrant Express | $2.122bn | Oct. 4, 2014 | 52 years, 2009–2061; about 35 years remain | Dynamic, five-minute repricing; CPI-linked soft cap and congestion exception | PABs, TIFIA at inception, public funds; $1.600bn debt at Dec. 2025 | Ferrovial 62.97%; Meridiam 37.03% | Traffic maturation and mandatory capacity expansion | Exposure through sponsor equity, fund secondary, or project bonds; strong cash flow offset by capex and sharing |
| LBJ Express | $2.645bn | Fully open Sept. 2015 | 52 years, 2009–2061; about 35 years remain | Dynamic managed lanes; HOV discounts; CPI-linked framework | PABs and TIFIA; $2.038bn debt at Dec. 2025 | Ferrovial 54.60%; APG 28.33%; Meridiam 17.07% | Successful ramp-up but high leverage; Wishbone expansion | Potential sponsor or pension secondary and project debt; main constraint is roughly 10.1x net debt/EBITDA |
| NTE 35W | About $2.327bn across 3A/3B/3C packages | Stages in 2016, 2018, and 2023 | 2013–2061; about 35 years remain | Dynamic managed lanes with speed target and sharing bands | PABs, TIFIA, bank facilities; $1.598bn debt at Dec. 2025 | Ferrovial 53.67%; APG 28.84%; Meridiam 17.49% | Segment additions, rapid growth, and rising revenue sharing | Large operating scale and sponsor/fund routes; value constrained by sharing, leverage, and future corridor obligations |
| Former SH 288 concession | $1.0635bn | Nov. 2020 | 52 years to March 2068; private term ended with 43.4 years left | Dynamic; annual minimum and cap linked to CPI and Texas nominal GSP per capita | $298.6m PABs and $357m TIFIA plus capitalized interest; repaid at termination | Public since Oct. 8, 2024; immediately prior: Abertis 56.76%, ACS 43.24% | $1.7317bn TxDOT termination | No private concession equity remains; possible exposure through TTFC bonds or operating procurements |
Remaining terms are approximate at the July 11, 2026 research cutoff. Costs may combine differently scoped construction packages; NTE 35W is explicitly aggregated across 3A, 3B, and 3C. Sources: S3, S6–S13.
Public and private delivery
| Issue | Public toll system | Private concession |
|---|---|---|
| Physical asset owner | Public authority, county, or state | Usually still the state or public sponsor |
| Toll-revenue recipient | Public enterprise or pledged system | Project company for a finite term, after contractual sharing |
| Capital provider | Revenue-bond investors; sometimes tax-supported debt and public funds | Equity sponsors, PAB investors, banks, TIFIA, and public contributions |
| Cost of debt | Often tax-exempt and lower-return | Can use tax-exempt PABs and TIFIA, but typically carries more structural risk |
| Equity requirement | No private equity return; retained net revenue acts as public capital | Explicit at-risk equity with a higher required return |
| Traffic risk | Pooled across system where revenues are cross-pledged | Usually concentrated in the project company |
| Toll-setting flexibility | Board or agency controlled; often more directly political | Contract formula may permit automatic or dynamic changes, still politically exposed |
| Financial transparency | Audited public statements and bond disclosure; stand-alone road data may be limited | Contract is often public; operating financials, cap tables, and debt can be selective |
| Ability to distribute cash | No dividends; cash retained, transferred for authorized purposes, or used on network | Distributions after O&M, capex, debt tests, reserves, sharing, and tax |
| Concession expiry | None | Toll and operating rights expire; handback and any supported residual claims follow their own contractual terms |
| Bankruptcy consequences | Debt restructuring affects public credit and system finance | Equity can be wiped out and debt converted while the road stays open |
| Incentive to maximize revenue | Balanced against policy, network, and affordability goals | Direct, but constrained by contract, demand elasticity, and political response |
Valuation questions
| Driver | Directional effect on equity | Mechanism | Constraint or nonlinearity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic growth | Positive | More paid transactions spread fixed costs | Can trigger revenue sharing, capacity capex, or congestion controls |
| Toll growth | Positive if demand holds | Raises revenue per trip | Elasticity and political resistance can reduce volume |
| Inflation | Often positive for revenue | Indexed tolls can rise | O&M, maintenance, and interest costs may also rise |
| Operating costs | Negative | Reduce cash before debt | Collection-risk allocation can shift costs to a public entity |
| Major maintenance | Negative near term | Consumes cash or requires new debt | Deferral can damage handback condition and long-term value |
| Leverage | Raises upside and downside | Smaller equity base magnifies value changes | Covenants can stop distributions before insolvency |
| Interest rates | Usually negative when higher | Increase refinancing cost and discount rate | Fixed-rate debt and inflation-linked tolls provide partial protection |
| Remaining concession life | Positive when longer | Adds years of distributable cash flow | No continuing toll right after expiry without an extension; any supported residual claim needs its own valuation |
| Political intervention | Usually negative for private equity | Can constrain rates, change exemptions, or trigger buyout | A contractual termination payment may protect creditors or create value |
| Competing road capacity | Usually negative | Reduces time savings and paid demand | Construction disruption can help toll traffic temporarily |
Concession dates
| Project | Public titleholder | Private concession end | Current private status |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Tarrant Express | TxDOT / State of Texas | 2061 | Active |
| LBJ Express | TxDOT / State of Texas | 2061 | Active |
| NTE 35W | TxDOT / State of Texas | 2061 | Active |
| SH 130 Segments 5–6 | TxDOT / State of Texas | 2062 | Active |
| SH 288 managed lanes | TxDOT / State of Texas | Original 2068 | Terminated in 2024 |
Road names and collection services
| Name encountered | What it identifies | Where to check control |
|---|---|---|
| NTTA | A public regional authority. Dallas North Tollway and President George Bush Turnpike are NTTA System facilities. | NTTA’s board page for governance; its road list for the exact facility. |
| NTE, LBJ Express or NTE 35W | Managed-lane projects with their own developer/operators; NTE is not NTTA. | The operator list identifies LBJ Infrastructure Group, NTE Mobility Partners, and NTE Segment 3’s own operator. |
| TollTag or ZipCash | NTTA’s account or invoice interface, which also handles travel on other operators’ lanes. | Read the facility named in the trip record, then look up that road’s operator. |
| TxTag | A different tag from NTTA’s TollTag. Accounts transferred to HCTRA can continue using their existing TxTag. | Use TxDOT’s current TxTag/HCTRA guidance; do not infer road ownership from the tag or bill. |
Checked October 23, 2026 against NTTA’s current board and road/operator pages, Chapter 366 and TxDOT’s tag guidance. This lookup does not revalue concessions, certify every property title or update the article’s financial reporting periods.
A road number can contain several businesses
SH 130 Segments 1–4 belong to TxDOT’s public system. Segments 5–6 are under a state concession whose company reports Strategic Value Partners as majority owner and the federal government as minority owner. The restructuring case dates its historical recoveries.
The SH 288 records identify different projects in Harris County and Brazoria County. The Harris County private agreement was terminated October 8, 2024. A record for the former private concession is not evidence that a private investor still owns those operating rights. Brazoria County’s authority states that its portion remained under county management. TxDOT termination record; BCTRA history.
NTTA and NTE are different entities. The database distinguishes public NTTA roads from private LBJ, NTE, and NTE 35W concession companies, and from TxDOT-operated TEXpress lanes. All can use NTTA billing. For example, a search for “I-35E” should not return the private NTE 35W project as if the interstate suffixes were interchangeable.
The stable ID joins the downloads
The stable record ID is the join key across CSV, JSON, and GeoJSON. Road and segment fields name the facility boundary, rather than treating an entire numbered highway as one business. Authority, operator, and billing agency have their own fields. Control type distinguishes public operation, private concession, and a return to public control.
Public-title, private-business ownership, and concession-end fields require their own evidence. Null means unavailable or inapplicable, as explained by the record note; it never means zero ownership. Source IDs resolve to the source list in JSON and the data dictionary. The checked-on date describes the source review, not the date the road was built or the concession signed.
The GeoJSON points put facilities into regional context using shared approximate locators and the site’s existing TxDOT state outline, so several records may occupy one point even while their road segments, authorities, and contractual rights remain different in the accompanying fields. Geometry orients the directory. It doesn’t certify a deed, parcel, road alignment, or maintenance limit.
| Field group | Use |
|---|---|
| id, road, segment | Identify and join the named facility record |
| authority, operator, billing_agency | Keep public responsibility, operation and payment service separate |
| roadway_title, private_business_owners, concession_end_year | Read the documented roadway title and private concession rights |
| control_type, region | Filter the directory and map |
| source_ids, checked_on, notes | Follow sources with their qualifications |
| locator coordinates and precision | Regional context only; not road geometry |
The download includes the complete field descriptions and the primary source URLs.
The edition covers selected named facilities
The map covers roads in TxDOT’s statewide operator table across Dallas–Fort Worth, Central Texas, Greater Houston, East Texas, and the Rio Grande Valley. It is a named-road lookup, with facilities sharing a system sometimes drawing on the same financing pledge. Adding their records as independent revenue enterprises would count that pledge more than once.
For a changed bill or newly opened segment, the linked operator and agency pages identify the current responsible service. The executed agreement and amendments govern a concession transfer or termination. A contractor’s renamed business still needs the ownership documents behind it.
I would use the map to locate the right entity, then follow the agreement for the specific segment. Public ownership, toll collection, and a private concession can coexist; the answer becomes useful when it tells me who can act on the bill or obligation in front of me.
For the governing entity behind a bill, read who owns NTTA. The foreign-investment guide separates company control and investor nationality; the US ownership comparison covers structures outside Texas.
Sources
- TxDOT, SH 288 Managed Lanes: executed agreements and termination page
(primary; current through 2026). Documents CDA execution, October 8, 2024 termination, reversion of control, and TTFC authorization.
- Texas Transportation Commission, July 30, 2024 minutes and July 31, 2025 minute orderAdditional source 2
(primary). Documents termination-for-convenience authority, the exact $1,731,730,721 payment, and State Highway Fund loan.
- U.S. DOT Build America Bureau, SH 288 project profile
(primary federal financing record). Project cost, original financing, participants, completion, termination waterfall, and TIFIA repayment.
- Abertis, “Puerto Rico and SH288 acquisitions,” October 18, 2023
(sponsor transaction presentation). Acquisition price and stake, pro forma revenue/EBITDA, gross debt, toll formula, and expiry.
- Abertis Infraestructuras annual accounts, 2025
(audited company filing). SH 288 proceeds received and recorded loss.
- Ferrovial Fact Book, May 2026, filed with the SEC
(current sponsor disclosure). DFW ownership percentages, concession terms, toll framework, 2025 operating figures, debt, distributions, sharing, and expansion.
- FHWA project profile, North Tarrant Express
(primary federal project record). Original cost, financing, term, opening, and original partners.
- FHWA project profile, LBJ Express
(primary federal project record). Original cost, financing, toll collection, term, and opening.
- FHWA project profile, NTE 35W
(primary federal project record). Segment costs, financing, term, construction dates, and dynamic-pricing objective.
- TxDOT, SH 130 Segments 5–6 executed agreements
(primary). Facility concession agreement and supporting documents.
- U.S. DOT Build America Bureau, SH 130 Segments 5–6 project profile
(primary federal financing record). Cost, capital structure, concession, bankruptcy, and U.S. DOT debt and equity recovery.
- FHWA, Report on Highway Public-Private Partnership Concessions in the United States, 2016
(federal analytical report). Original sponsor percentages, revenue-sharing and toll clauses, early forecast shortfall, liquidity stress, and bankruptcy context.
- Kentucky Public Pensions Authority, Project Spurs investment recommendation, September 6, 2024
(public pension investment memorandum; sponsor-derived underlying data). SH 130 65/35 ownership, continuation vehicle, performance, toll escalation, concession term, and restructuring narrative.
- SH 130 Concession Company, current company history and FAQs
(company source, updated through July 2026). State title, majority/minority ownership description, 2025 transactions, improvements, and current operations.
- NTTA 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
(audited public-system statement). Traffic, revenue, debt, coverage, pledged system, and system assets.
- NTTA Board of Directors and system pages
(primary governance source). Appointment structure and facilities.
- Harris County 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
(audited county statement). HCTRA revenue, expenses, debt, coverage, cash flow, and transfers.
- CTRMA 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and governance page
(audited authority statement). System composition, revenue, debt, coverage, and board appointments.
- Fort Bend County Toll Road Authority FY2025 Annual Financial Report
(audited public authority statement). Revenue, debt, governance, and tax-supported obligations.
- Fort Bend Grand Parkway Toll Road Authority FY2025 Annual Financial Report
(audited public authority statement). Right of use, revenue, debt, and county component-unit status.
- TxDOT HB 803 Report, FY2025
(primary state project reporting). Revenue, operating expenses, maintenance, debt service, maturities, SH 288 transition, and non-financed facilities.
- TxDOT 2025 Popular Annual Financial Report
(primary state financial summary). Toll-system net position and SH 288 funding/refunding context.
- U.S. Census Bureau, Texas QuickFacts and metropolitan population analyses, 2024–25Additional source 2Additional source 3
(primary demographic data). State, DFW, Houston, Austin, and exurban growth.
- Texas A&M Transportation Institute, 2025 Texas’ 100 Most Congested Road Sections
(research institute report using 2024 data). Congestion and truck-delay evidence.
- TxDOT Texas Freight Mobility Plan and port/freight statisticsAdditional source 2
(primary state planning data). Freight tonnage, growth outlook, ports, and trade corridors.
- TxDOT NTE current executed-agreements indexVerified Oct 16, 2026
Current source route; read the selected project’s agreement and amendments for actual terms.
- HCTRA FY2025 separate financial reportVerified Oct 16, 2026
Authority-level audited financial report; fiscal year ended September 30, 2025. Supplemental source route, not a new reporting period.
- TxDOT: NTE 35W Amended and Restated Facility Agreement and Technical Provisions (official ZIP bundle)Verified Sep 23, 2026
Access rechecked October 19, 2026. The agreement is available in TxDOT’s official ZIP bundle. The original contract analysis and its September 2026 evidence date are unchanged.
- FHWA: DBFOM toll-concession project profilesVerified Sep 23, 2026
- FHWA: Toll Facilities in the United StatesVerified Sep 23, 2026
- TxDOT: NTE project segments and developersVerified Oct 16, 2026
Identifies developer for Segments 1/2W and Segment 3A/B/C I-35W project; no merger of project counterparties inferred.
- FHWA: public-private partnership agreement libraryVerified Sep 23, 2026
- NTTA: financial information and debt-obligation transparencyVerified Sep 23, 2026
- NTTA: September 2026 committee notice and authority descriptionVerified Sep 23, 2026
- HCTRA: FY2025 Toll Road Authority Enterprise Fund financial statementsVerified Sep 23, 2026
- NTTA: public authority, member counties and gubernatorial appointmentVerified Oct 16, 2026
November2025 issuer release: institutional description and public appointment route. Does not reverify every project title or individual security.
- Texas Transportation Code, Chapter 366: public status and board appointment powersVerified Oct 23, 2026
Sections 366.032 and 366.251 define governmental status and county/governor appointment powers. Checked for the dated governance addition; original financial claims keep their own sources and periods.
- NTTA: current facility, TEXpress operator and payment guideVerified Oct 23, 2026
Lists NTTA facilities and TEXpress lanes by their different operators; identifies private project and TxDOT operators; explains TollTag and ZipCash use. No private equity percentage or individual title search is inferred.
- TxDOT: TxTag accounts transferred to HCTRA and retained road responsibilitiesVerified Oct 23, 2026
The Is TxTag going away FAQ says transferred customers may continue using the tag, directs account service to HCTRA and states that TxDOT keeps road ownership, maintenance and rate-setting responsibilities. This is service guidance, not a title transfer.
- Least-Present-Value-of-Revenue Auctions and Highway FranchisingEngel, Fischer and Galetovic / Journal of Political Economy · 2001-10Verified Oct 25, 2026
2001 model varies concession length with realized demand and a discounted-revenue target. Its assumptions and proposal do not describe the executed Texas fixed-term contracts or imply automatic extension.
- Model Toll Concessions Contract Guide, draft addendum, section 11Federal Highway Administration · 2015-01Verified Oct 25, 2026
January 2015 guide explains lender cure, step-in, substitution, and bankruptcy-continuity provisions. It is a design reference, not a governing Texas agreement or a finding that a particular lender holds each right.
- SH 130 original Facility Concession Agreement, sections 2.2 and 4.2TxDOT / SH 130 Concession Company · 2007-03-22Verified Oct 25, 2026
March 22, 2007 archived agreement; selected clauses checked from the October 21 archive/OCR. Distinguishes no general state debt liability from specific contractual and termination obligations; later amendments need their own review.
- TxDOT: toll roads in Texas and operator/billing table
Primary named-facility and billing-provider baseline, checked October 26, 2026. Selected facilities are expanded to individual records.
- TxDOT: SH 130 executed concession agreement and amendments
State title and finite southern concession; northern road is a different public system.
- Brazoria County Toll Road Authority: history
Distinguishes its county portion from TxDOT’s returned-to-public-control Harris County lanes.
- TxDOT: SH 288 executed agreements and termination
TxDOT’s October 8, 2024 termination of the Harris County private concession.
Supporting material
- Texas toll-road ownership records (CSV) ↗Dated named-facility records with separate authority, operator, billing, concession, and source fields. Missing title or investor fields remain blank.
- Ownership records and source ledger (JSON) ↗The same records and their primary source IDs in a structured format.
- Regional ownership locators (GeoJSON) ↗The same record IDs with approximate regional points, not road alignments.
- Data dictionary and scope (Markdown) ↗Every field, source URL, geographic precision and coverage rule.